All reports
Tikal reports
#118315: "Allow via table option original rule for camp establishment"
implemented: This suggestion has been implemented
8
What is this report about?
What happened? Please select from below
Suggestion: in my opinion, the following would greatly improve the game implementation
Detailed description
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
Longtime fans of Tikal will be very familiar with the rule that, to establish a new camp, "The player need not have an expedition member in the hexagon..."
I'd like to express strong and enthusiastic support that this rule be supported with this implementation via a table option, as the new rule represents a significant change to the game.• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v96
Report history
Mar 22nd 2024 13:42 • bananasplay • This suggestion has not been analyzed by the developers yet:
At first I thought that the current rule implementation was incorrect, but I did some research prior to submitting it as such, and discovered this thread on BGG: boardgamegeek.com/thread/2678237/rule-change-establishing-camp
...and, sadly, the new publisher changed the rule. :-(
So, instead of reporting a bug, I'm submitting a suggestion, which I'm hoping will be given due consideration, given that this is a venerable game, with fans like myself who've appreciated the game for years, but who may not appreciate a rule change of this magnitude.
...and, sadly, the new publisher changed the rule. :-(
So, instead of reporting a bug, I'm submitting a suggestion, which I'm hoping will be given due consideration, given that this is a venerable game, with fans like myself who've appreciated the game for years, but who may not appreciate a rule change of this magnitude.
Oct 20th 2024 19:05 • Denis • This suggestion has not been analyzed by the developers yet:
I have played this game for over 20 years, and was surprised to see this rule in the BGA implementation. This is a very big change to the game, so I am in favor of it being an optional rule.
At the least, there should be a visible notice to players about how this rule is enforced (perhaps a note in the game history?), as I'm sure there are many people who will not expect this. In fact, it messed up my turn, as I had placed an empty tile, thinking I would be able to put a camp there, and could not undo the tile placement.
At the least, there should be a visible notice to players about how this rule is enforced (perhaps a note in the game history?), as I'm sure there are many people who will not expect this. In fact, it messed up my turn, as I had placed an empty tile, thinking I would be able to put a camp there, and could not undo the tile placement.
Nov 4th 2024 18:59 • Sir Heo • This suggestion has been implemented:
Old rule implemented as game option
Add to this report
Please add here anything that seems relevant in order to reproduce this bug or understand your suggestion:
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appear several times? Every time? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
