#118315: "Allow via table option original rule for camp establishment"
What is this report about?
What happened? Please select from below
What happened? Please select from below
Please check if there is already a report on the same subject
If yes, please VOTE for this report. Reports with the most votes are given PRIORITY!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detailed description
-
• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.
Longtime fans of Tikal will be very familiar with the rule that, to establish a new camp, "The player need not have an expedition member in the hexagon..."
I'd like to express strong and enthusiastic support that this rule be supported with this implementation via a table option, as the new rule represents a significant change to the game. -
• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v96
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Longtime fans of Tikal will be very familiar with the rule that, to establish a new camp, "The player need not have an expedition member in the hexagon..."
I'd like to express strong and enthusiastic support that this rule be supported with this implementation via a table option, as the new rule represents a significant change to the game. -
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v96
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
Longtime fans of Tikal will be very familiar with the rule that, to establish a new camp, "The player need not have an expedition member in the hexagon..."
I'd like to express strong and enthusiastic support that this rule be supported with this implementation via a table option, as the new rule represents a significant change to the game. • Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v96
-
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
Longtime fans of Tikal will be very familiar with the rule that, to establish a new camp, "The player need not have an expedition member in the hexagon..."
I'd like to express strong and enthusiastic support that this rule be supported with this implementation via a table option, as the new rule represents a significant change to the game. • Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v96
-
• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation?
Longtime fans of Tikal will be very familiar with the rule that, to establish a new camp, "The player need not have an expedition member in the hexagon..."
I'd like to express strong and enthusiastic support that this rule be supported with this implementation via a table option, as the new rule represents a significant change to the game. -
• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v96
-
• What was the game action you wanted to do?
Longtime fans of Tikal will be very familiar with the rule that, to establish a new camp, "The player need not have an expedition member in the hexagon..."
I'd like to express strong and enthusiastic support that this rule be supported with this implementation via a table option, as the new rule represents a significant change to the game. -
• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?
-
• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v96
-
• At which step of the game did the problem occur? What was the current game instruction?
Longtime fans of Tikal will be very familiar with the rule that, to establish a new camp, "The player need not have an expedition member in the hexagon..."
I'd like to express strong and enthusiastic support that this rule be supported with this implementation via a table option, as the new rule represents a significant change to the game. -
• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v96
-
• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Longtime fans of Tikal will be very familiar with the rule that, to establish a new camp, "The player need not have an expedition member in the hexagon..."
I'd like to express strong and enthusiastic support that this rule be supported with this implementation via a table option, as the new rule represents a significant change to the game. • Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v96
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Longtime fans of Tikal will be very familiar with the rule that, to establish a new camp, "The player need not have an expedition member in the hexagon..."
I'd like to express strong and enthusiastic support that this rule be supported with this implementation via a table option, as the new rule represents a significant change to the game. -
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v96
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
Longtime fans of Tikal will be very familiar with the rule that, to establish a new camp, "The player need not have an expedition member in the hexagon..."
I'd like to express strong and enthusiastic support that this rule be supported with this implementation via a table option, as the new rule represents a significant change to the game. • Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v96
Report history
...and, sadly, the new publisher changed the rule. :-(
So, instead of reporting a bug, I'm submitting a suggestion, which I'm hoping will be given due consideration, given that this is a venerable game, with fans like myself who've appreciated the game for years, but who may not appreciate a rule change of this magnitude.
At the least, there should be a visible notice to players about how this rule is enforced (perhaps a note in the game history?), as I'm sure there are many people who will not expect this. In fact, it messed up my turn, as I had placed an empty tile, thinking I would be able to put a camp there, and could not undo the tile placement.
Add to this report
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appear several times? Every time? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
