#91113: "Skirmish not resulting in tie"
What is this report about?
What happened? Please select from below
What happened? Please select from below
Please check if there is already a report on the same subject
If yes, please VOTE for this report. Reports with the most votes are given PRIORITY!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detailed description
-
• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.
During round 5, the contested card was awarded to a player even though the skirmish resulted in a tie for fight value and number of people. It may be because it did not count the group leader as 2 people.
-
• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened
Round 5
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v114
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
During round 5, the contested card was awarded to a player even though the skirmish resulted in a tie for fight value and number of people. It may be because it did not count the group leader as 2 people.
-
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
Round 5
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v114
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
During round 5, the contested card was awarded to a player even though the skirmish resulted in a tie for fight value and number of people. It may be because it did not count the group leader as 2 people.
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v114
-
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
During round 5, the contested card was awarded to a player even though the skirmish resulted in a tie for fight value and number of people. It may be because it did not count the group leader as 2 people.
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v114
-
• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation?
During round 5, the contested card was awarded to a player even though the skirmish resulted in a tie for fight value and number of people. It may be because it did not count the group leader as 2 people.
-
• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
Round 5
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v114
-
• What was the game action you wanted to do?
During round 5, the contested card was awarded to a player even though the skirmish resulted in a tie for fight value and number of people. It may be because it did not count the group leader as 2 people.
-
• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?
Round 5
-
• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v114
-
• At which step of the game did the problem occur? What was the current game instruction?
During round 5, the contested card was awarded to a player even though the skirmish resulted in a tie for fight value and number of people. It may be because it did not count the group leader as 2 people.
-
• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
Round 5
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v114
-
• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
During round 5, the contested card was awarded to a player even though the skirmish resulted in a tie for fight value and number of people. It may be because it did not count the group leader as 2 people.
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v114
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
During round 5, the contested card was awarded to a player even though the skirmish resulted in a tie for fight value and number of people. It may be because it did not count the group leader as 2 people.
-
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
Round 5
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v114
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
During round 5, the contested card was awarded to a player even though the skirmish resulted in a tie for fight value and number of people. It may be because it did not count the group leader as 2 people.
• Which browser are you using?
Google Chrome v114
Report history
2. How many people did the tied players have?
3. Which cards were active in the skirmish?
4. Has the game ended? We cannot troubleshoot games in progress.
We've seen thousands of tied skirmishes with no issues, so we now ask for this info before investigating a report.
2. How many people did the tied players have? Each player had 3
smischel has a skirmish strength of 4 (Brawler, Group Leaders)
Wilvictus has a skirmish strength of 4 (Multitool, Brawler, Refugee, Scavenger)
3. Which cards were active in the skirmish?
Wilvictus used a Saboteur, to take out smischel's spear. I see now: When cards are played during the Resource Gathering phase, they are discarded after use.
During the Skirmish Phase, all cards remain until the end of the round, even if a special power
is activated (e.g. saboteur or sniper team).
Therefore the saboteur counted towards the people total.
4. Has the game ended? We cannot troubleshoot games in progress. not yet. But this is not a bug its a detail in the rules I did not understand.
Add to this report
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appear several times? Every time? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
