#42906: "non-adjacent capture follows opponent's non-capture"
What is this report about?
What happened? Please select from below
What happened? Please select from below
Please check if there is already a report on the same subject
If yes, please VOTE for this report. Reports with the most votes are given PRIORITY!
| # | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
|---|
Detailed description
-
• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
-
• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened
Yes. Move 29-30
• Which browser are you using?
Microsoft Edge
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
-
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
Yes. Move 29-30
• Which browser are you using?
Microsoft Edge
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
• Which browser are you using?
Microsoft Edge
-
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
• Which browser are you using?
Microsoft Edge
-
• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation?
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
-
• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
Yes. Move 29-30
• Which browser are you using?
Microsoft Edge
-
• What was the game action you wanted to do?
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
-
• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?
Yes. Move 29-30
-
• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Microsoft Edge
-
• At which step of the game did the problem occur? What was the current game instruction?
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
-
• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
Yes. Move 29-30
• Which browser are you using?
Microsoft Edge
-
• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
• Which browser are you using?
Microsoft Edge
-
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
-
• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
Yes. Move 29-30
• Which browser are you using?
Microsoft Edge
-
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
My opponent grew a 2-bug adjacent to my 2-bug but couldn't capture b/c there was no legal grow. I then grew a 2-bug non-adjacent to any of my opponent's 2-bugs. My opponents non-adjacent 2-bug was then captured b/c (I assume) it was adjacent to my existing 2-bug... If that makes any sense at all. My interpretation of the rules is that eating only occurs by the bug that has just been grown. Here, an existing non-grown bug did the eating.
• Which browser are you using?
Microsoft Edge
Report history
> All your bugs which are adjacent to one or more enemy bugs of the same shape (but not necessarily the same orientation) must eat (capture) those enemy bugs
There is nothing here which says only the newest bug can eat, or that eating must happen after a bug is placed or grows. It's just based on adjacency and the possibility of being able to grow after!
We can probably help other users by updating the wiki rules to make this clear.
Add to this report
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appear several times? Every time? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
