#17059: "option to make shorter games"
What is this report about?
What happened? Please select from below
What happened? Please select from below
Please check if there is already a report on the same subject
If yes, please VOTE for this report. Reports with the most votes are given PRIORITY!
# | Status | Votes | Game | Type | Title | Last update |
---|
Detailed description
• Please copy/paste the error message you see on your screen, if applicable.
Each round of "6 nimmt!" is independent but getting someone down from 66 can take a while, especially with a lot of players evenly matched.
It would be interesting to be able to configure the starting score and/or a fixed number of rounds as suggested in the rulebook.• Please explain what you wanted to do, what you did and what happened
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Each round of "6 nimmt!" is independent but getting someone down from 66 can take a while, especially with a lot of players evenly matched.
It would be interesting to be able to configure the starting score and/or a fixed number of rounds as suggested in the rulebook.• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
Each round of "6 nimmt!" is independent but getting someone down from 66 can take a while, especially with a lot of players evenly matched.
It would be interesting to be able to configure the starting score and/or a fixed number of rounds as suggested in the rulebook.• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
• What was displayed on the screen when you were blocked (Blank screen? Part of the game interface? Error message?)
Each round of "6 nimmt!" is independent but getting someone down from 66 can take a while, especially with a lot of players evenly matched.
It would be interesting to be able to configure the starting score and/or a fixed number of rounds as suggested in the rulebook.• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
• Which part of the rules was not followed by the BGA adaptation
Each round of "6 nimmt!" is independent but getting someone down from 66 can take a while, especially with a lot of players evenly matched.
It would be interesting to be able to configure the starting score and/or a fixed number of rounds as suggested in the rulebook.• Is the rules violation visible on game replay? If yes, at which move number?
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
• What was the game action you wanted to do?
Each round of "6 nimmt!" is independent but getting someone down from 66 can take a while, especially with a lot of players evenly matched.
It would be interesting to be able to configure the starting score and/or a fixed number of rounds as suggested in the rulebook.• What did you try to do to trigger this game action?
• What happened when you tried to do this (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
• At which step of the game did the problem occur (what was the current game instruction)?
Each round of "6 nimmt!" is independent but getting someone down from 66 can take a while, especially with a lot of players evenly matched.
It would be interesting to be able to configure the starting score and/or a fixed number of rounds as suggested in the rulebook.• What happened when you tried to do this game action (error message, game status bar message, ...)?
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
• Please describe the display issue. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Each round of "6 nimmt!" is independent but getting someone down from 66 can take a while, especially with a lot of players evenly matched.
It would be interesting to be able to configure the starting score and/or a fixed number of rounds as suggested in the rulebook.• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
• Please copy/paste the text displayed in English instead of your language. If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.
Each round of "6 nimmt!" is independent but getting someone down from 66 can take a while, especially with a lot of players evenly matched.
It would be interesting to be able to configure the starting score and/or a fixed number of rounds as suggested in the rulebook.• Is this text available in the translation system? If yes, has it been translated for more than 24 hours?
• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
• Please explain your suggestion precisely and concisely so that it's as easy as possible to understand what you mean.
Each round of "6 nimmt!" is independent but getting someone down from 66 can take a while, especially with a lot of players evenly matched.
It would be interesting to be able to configure the starting score and/or a fixed number of rounds as suggested in the rulebook.• Which browser are you using?
Mozilla v5
Report history
We have had competitions with 30 players playing at 6 tables. It would be so useful to be able to compare scores at the end, but we can't because some players only played 2 rounds while others played 6.
Bottom line, since it is allowed in the rules, it should be allowed on BGA.
In the official rules, the alternatives of “play a specific number of rounds” or “play to a different point total than 66” are explicitly mentioned. So these alternatives already have official approval.
Add to this report
- Another table ID / move ID
- Did F5 solve the problem?
- Did the problem appear several times? Every time? Randomly?
- If you have a screenshot of this bug (good practice), you can use Imgur.com to upload it and copy/paste the link here.